Profit or people? Find out how Dodge v. Ford and Milton Friedman’s essay ignited the fiery debate on shareholder capitalism!
In today’s evolving business landscape, Shareholder Capitalism continues to spark debates and discussions. Shareholder Capitalism, which emphasizes maximizing shareholder value and profits, has been the dominant model in corporate governance for decades. I will delve into the foundations of shareholder capitalism by examining two influential events that have significantly influenced its development: the landmark court case Dodge v. Ford Motor Company and Milton Friedman‘s influential essay, “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits.“
By exploring the historical context and key arguments presented in these two critical milestones, I hope to provide an understanding of shareholder capitalism’s core principles, its implications on modern business practices, and the ongoing debate surrounding corporate purpose and responsibility.
Dodge vs. Ford Motor Company
As I began exploring the foundations of shareholder capitalism, I couldn’t ignore the significance of the Dodge v. Ford Motor Company case. This landmark legal battle occurred in 1919 and has played a crucial role in defining the relationship between corporations and their shareholders.
When I first read about the case, I was intrigued by the dynamics between the Dodge brothers and Henry Ford. John and Horace Dodge, who owned about 10% of Ford Motor Company‘s shares, were not only early investors in the company but also founders of their own automobile company, Dodge Brothers Company, which eventually became a competitor to Ford.
The crux of the conflict arose when Henry Ford decided to reinvest the company’s excess profits in lowering car prices, increasing employee wages, and expanding production capabilities, instead of paying out special dividends to shareholders. This decision didn’t sit well with the Dodge brothers, who believed their returns as shareholders would be negatively impacted, especially considering their competitive relationship with Ford.
The Dodge brothers sued Ford Motor Company, alleging that Henry Ford was neglecting the best interests of the shareholders. They claimed Ford was misusing corporate funds for his social agenda rather than prioritizing shareholder returns. The case was heard in the Circuit Court for Wayne County, Michigan.
The court ruled in favor of the Dodge brothers. The judge emphasized that a company’s primary purpose is to benefit its shareholders, and the management has a fiduciary duty to maximize profits for the shareholders’ benefit. As a result, the court ordered Ford Motor Company to pay a special dividend to the shareholders, including the Dodge brothers.
The implications of the Dodge v. Ford Motor Company case on corporate governance have been profound. First, it set a precedent that reinforced the idea of shareholder primacy, asserting that the primary responsibility of a company’s management is to generate profits for its shareholders. This ruling has had a lasting impact on how corporations operate, shaping the principles of shareholder capitalism as we know it today.
Milton Friedman – “The Social Responsibility of a Business is to Increase Its Profits”
Another important moment for shareholder capitalism was from renowned economist Milton Friedman. In his essay, “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits,” published in The New York Times Magazine in 1970, Friedman presented a compelling argument for shareholder capitalism that left a permanent mark in the corporate world.
Friedman’s main idea is that a corporation’s primary responsibility is to generate profits for its shareholders. He argues that the management, as agents of the shareholders, should focus solely on maximizing shareholder value within legal and ethical frameworks. This idea directly relates to the Dodge v. Ford Motor Company case, where the court emphasized the primacy of shareholder interests and management’s fiduciary duty.
In his critique of corporate social responsibility, Friedman asserts that pursuing social goals can lead to misusing shareholder funds. He believes that when businesses spend money on social causes, they essentially use shareholder money for purposes that the shareholders may not endorse. The problem is that shareholders may need to have a say in spending their money.
Friedman argues that rather than corporations, the government is responsible for tackling social issues through legislation and regulation, funded by taxes. By attempting to solve social problems, businesses risk diverting their attention from their core function of generating profits.
The Evolution of Shareholder Capitalism
The idea of shareholder capitalism has come under intense pressure in the past two decades. While Dodge v. Ford Motor Company and Milton Friedman’s essay laid the groundwork for shareholder primacy, the legal landscape and the perspectives on corporate purpose have evolved. This evolution has led to alternative approaches, such as Stakeholder Capitalism and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), which challenge the traditional notion of shareholder primacy. (CSR was pushed heavily during my MBA studies.)
One item of recent note is the Business Roundtable‘s Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation in 2019. Comprising CEOs from major U.S. corporations, the Business Roundtable announced a shift away from the shareholder approach. Instead, they emphasized the importance of considering a broader range of stakeholders, including employees, customers, suppliers, and communities. This statement reflects a changing mindset among business leaders and a growing recognition of the need for a more balanced approach to corporate governance.
In recent years, there has been increasing emphasis on the importance of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors in corporate decision-making. As a result, many companies are now adopting ESG strategies and integrating sustainability into their business models, recognizing that long-term value creation requires a more broad-based approach to managing companies.
While shareholder capitalism remains a dominant model in the corporate world, the evolution of corporate governance practices and the rise of alternative approaches signal a more nuanced and complex landscape. Moreover, the ongoing debate surrounding the purpose of a corporation and its responsibilities to shareholders and other stakeholders underscores the need for continued conversation.
The bottom line is that shareholder capitalism has been a defining force in corporate governance for decades. The landmark Dodge v. Ford Motor Company case and Milton Friedman’s influential essay have played pivotal roles in shaping the principles and practices of shareholder capitalism. However, the evolving legal landscape and the rise of alternative approaches, such as stakeholder theory and corporate social responsibility, have challenged the notion of shareholder primacy.
Updated 4/28/2023 with Grammarly recommendations.
Christopher Padilla 
You must be logged in to post a comment.